We’re Currently #2 for Take-Off, So We’re Going to Turn on the Highbeams, Adjust the Rib Bumpers, and Raise the Goodyears

by Prongs on October 9, 2009

Spike was really looking forward to his first tandem skydiving jump. Although, he was concerned that the airbags were behind him.

What's really offensive is the condition of this manicure.

You two make a lovely pair, Jessie S.

{ 211 comments }

1 Happycat 10.09.09 at 8:08 am

Whoo-oo! Cat-n-racks!

2 Rhea 10.09.09 at 8:09 am

What’s with the nail polish? Looks like she slammed her hands in a car door.

3 Kelsey 10.09.09 at 8:10 am

Fuzzy animals in your clothing is both unnerving and very comforting at the same time. I’m always afraid I’ll be gutted, but the heart-warming snuggling action is pure bliss.
His floof-factor is just perfect for this too!

4 Bryn Greenwood 10.09.09 at 8:11 am

Racks and manicures
Let the commentroversy
begin. Three, two, one.

Wait…this isn’t the Friday Haiku? :D

5 Theo 10.09.09 at 8:11 am

:lol: LOL from top to… well, it’s all about the top, isn’t it.

6 meggie 10.09.09 at 8:13 am

that is a lot of rack.

7 MadameX 10.09.09 at 8:17 am

Racks look, ahhh, surgically enhanced, but the kittie’s precious…

Enjoy, boys.

PS. Still waiting for Dudes ‘n Doggies…

8 GreyandWhite Kitty 10.09.09 at 8:22 am

Instead of cute that’s just gross. It would be nice to see a different picture of this kitty. Maybe sleeping or eating? This was way too much.

9 Copperbat 10.09.09 at 8:22 am

Hoooray for bewbies and mewbies! :D

10 Ray 10.09.09 at 8:30 am

I’ve never wanted to be a black kitty more than now…

11 Hon Glad 10.09.09 at 8:31 am

A rather unedifing picture, surely there must be others from the cute archive?

[You could always try clicking the tag... - Ed.]

12 aunt issa 10.09.09 at 8:33 am

Never mind the nail polish – that chick has man-hands! Nice boobs, though. And an adorable kitty! Yay!

13 Kar 10.09.09 at 8:36 am

I don’t think that I’ve ever been tempted to wear a different color on each arm. Or think of matching it with my bra.

On the other hand, if I had creamy skin like that I could be tempted.

I wanna see if she uses two different colored claw covers on this little one.

14 Chuck 10.09.09 at 8:37 am

Very tacky post

15 Theo 10.09.09 at 8:37 am

Very long-titled post

16 Hon Glad 10.09.09 at 8:38 am

Editheo – I clicked, I saw, they conquered.

17 Stephen 10.09.09 at 8:43 am

I agree. Didn’t think your website had to dip into the T&A bag for more attention.

18 BabyOpossum 10.09.09 at 8:46 am

I prefer pics where the cat is snuggled into the rack. This one looks like he is trying to escape the rack, or at the least he’s indifferent to it. (Maybe he senses it’s not real?) (Ha, kidding. Lovely rack, lovely cat, and so forth. Carry on.)

19 Camille 10.09.09 at 8:48 am

This site has been doing Cats ‘n’ Racks forever – why the big disapproval all of a sudden?

20 Camille 10.09.09 at 8:49 am

(Although, this being ‘Tocktober and all, maybe Buns and Buns would be more suitable.)

21 John 10.09.09 at 8:50 am

You just lost daily viewers I’m sure. Thanks for making me gag on silicone this morning. Way to take the focus off what your site is… you must have been running out of submissions! Bring back the good posts!

[LOL. :lol: - Ed.]

[By the way, it sounds like you're doing it wrong. - Ed.]

22 sally 10.09.09 at 8:54 am

They have been doing cats n racks forever. click on the tag… this one is more racks than cats and it’s not even a good rack! kitty is trying to escape from the hard melons and into a softer place! the other cats n racks posts are more appropriate.

[OK now I'm seriously ROFL'ing... does make typing awkward... - Ed.]

23 Kelsey 10.09.09 at 8:57 am

Stephen,
It got YOUR attention, did it not? That’s why you clicked on here to comment. ;) They’re just boobs. I have some, your mom had some… BOOBS, BREASTS, CHESTICLES, TA-TAS, MAMS, whatever, they’re ok! They’re a body part- not perverse, not obscene, not anything other than human flesh (and they’re covered too…).
It’s your own mind that turns them into something erotic or ‘wrong’- this country needs to let go of the stigma behind (oh, another one) TITS. :)

24 annie 10.09.09 at 8:58 am

Oh come ON. It’s a great rack (even if it is fake) and an adorable kitten.

What a bunch of Prudey McPrudensteins.

You complainers sound like a bunch of overweight office ladies whining in your cubicles because your tatas hang down to your belly button.

[Now now, there's no need for that. :P - Ed.]

25 Theo 10.09.09 at 8:59 am

I’m partial to “gazongas” myself. *snkr*

26 The Dude 10.09.09 at 8:59 am

Aunt Issa: “man hands” brilliant. Perhaps, that is why the head is cut off in this picture…

27 Theo 10.09.09 at 9:01 am

@Dude @Aunt Issa — not “man hands”. Trust me, I’ve got a pair. ;)

28 Angela 10.09.09 at 9:04 am

Oh geeze. We will stare unyieldingly at the ‘tocks of any barn yard animal but cannot handle a glimpse of the female homosapien chest? Come on… Also, I don’t think they’re fake, just enhanced by the bathing suit.

29 Angela 10.09.09 at 9:05 am

Oh, and how about a “Pups n Packages” just to balance out the Cats n Racks? :)

30 skippymom 10.09.09 at 9:08 am

Ahhh…it’s a perfect day to sit back with a nice cup of tea and watch the commentroversy roll.

31 Kelsey 10.09.09 at 9:10 am

Lol, or even worse Angela, Buns and Bulges :o (ok, THAT probably crossed a line…)

32 Lisa 10.09.09 at 9:13 am

“John” and “Stephen” both sound like Angela from The Office writing under a pseudonym. We’re really supposed to believe that there are MEN who are capable of using the internet and who are offended by a little cleavage? They might want to consider joining an order of monks. Or they could stick around for Pups n’ Peens, that might be more their cup of tea!

[ :spit-take: BFFFFFFFPTHP! ...Oh eww. - Ed.]

33 Kevin 10.09.09 at 9:13 am

yea Jason is right. no more covered up fug face rack posts. let’s keep it real with sweet boobs. take the kitty out of the picture – can’t even see it’s face anyways. wonder how young this broad is :P

[Pick one screen name and stick to it. Astroturfing doesn't fly here, Jason. - Ed.]

34 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 9:19 am

hmmmm….exactly where, on the donkey, should I pin this tail?

while meself, I’d just as soon not bother with either a “cats/ racks” category or its alternative (you could have the whole cat-egory — see what i did there :) and I’d let everyone else do their thing & I prob. wouldn’t even open it up) …or a category for the alternative set…I might not even open that one up at all – But I’d be happy for those who enjoy at least the more conventionally cute ones….

Yet and still: I gotta give Angela (#29) MAJOR POINTS !!
just for grammatically correct phrasing (which in itself is enjoyable to some of us)
& also for her cute marketing abilities,

about her suggested title
(almost typed in “tittle” there just to keep the “point” going) …….

Pups & Packages sounds so endearing ! You could even do a special “P & P — Holiday gifts” item on Christmas, Valentine’s Day, etc etc.

But meself, I mostly go for the heartfelt but less sensually/ intimacy limited stuff

Other than those thoughts ….Have at it, gang!

35 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 9:22 am

@ skippymom: how shall we quantify this one: count how many WANT graphically offensive items & how many want only Romper Room?

Or is your strategy, to simply watch the heads & other items roll without trying to analyze the overall summary of who wins (or who is most ridiculous)?
Hmmmmmmmm?

36 Trabb's Boy 10.09.09 at 9:23 am

Whoa! What is with all this belittling of women going on here? Prongs first with the “airbags” comment, then all the “they’re fake!” folks and the “what’s wrong with her hands?!?” folks and of course annie, who wins the Asshole of the Thread award. Folks, this is not “Hot or Not”. This woman thought it was a cute picture of her kitty cheering on Cats and Racks. Personal critiques are just mean. All of your mothers would be disappointed in you. Nuff nuff nuff nuff nuff.

[Actually the Asshole of the Thread Award is the banhammer, and I mete that out. Repeatedly. - Ed.]

37 Hon Glad 10.09.09 at 9:26 am

The rack aint bothering me, its just an ineptly taken photograph. No sense of composition or lighting.

38 Kar 10.09.09 at 9:26 am

We can always call ‘em Blouse Bunnies if you think it’s more appropriate for an animal-related site.

Who thinks up these names?

[Did somebody say "blouse bunnies"?? - Ed.]

39 hyura 10.09.09 at 9:28 am

@Trabb’s Boy: thank you!

40 Jim N 10.09.09 at 9:31 am

Sorry to nuff…but this is totally ’shopped! Just look at the pixels!

[I did. Dear sweet Atlas moon shot, did I ever. - Ed.]

41 annie 10.09.09 at 9:35 am

I won?!

I.. I don’t even have a speech prepared!

42 Von Zeppelin 10.09.09 at 9:44 am

I haven’t decided whether I approve of this picture or not, but it does have a couple of good points.

43 Theo 10.09.09 at 9:45 am

The upholstery isn’t really my thing.

44 Jen Hunter 10.09.09 at 9:48 am

I’m all for boobage, but the silicone is yucky.

45 Juno 10.09.09 at 9:51 am

Darn, someone beat me to “blouse bunnies.” My personal favorite.

46 AmyJ 10.09.09 at 9:51 am

Kitty is adorable and very brave to try jumping! And I think the rack looks pretty darn good, I’m sure envious. As for the fingernails, that’s why I only do my toes. Fingernails require too much maintenance.

47 doggabone 10.09.09 at 9:57 am

It has been suggested that when such controversy re-occurs, that there might be something to link to.

Not sure why folks are hollerin’ “fake”. Looks as genuine as the kittens I woke up with this morning. I mean, it might be a stuffed cutie, but without touching you’d never know for sure.

48 skippymom 10.09.09 at 9:57 am

@Res, just enjoying the ride, and being thankful that we have our esteemed Theo to deal with whatever comes up.

[As opposed to "steamed Theo", presumably - Ed.]

49 mems13 10.09.09 at 9:59 am

I should shove one of my cats down my shirt and send in a pic. They (my cats) would probably think i’m crazy.
I wish my babies, all of them, were still little. *sigh*

50 doggabone 10.09.09 at 10:00 am

Whups, I blew the link to something.

[Dude, no worries, got yer back... - Ed.]

51 bargles 10.09.09 at 10:00 am

I’m all for Cats n’ Racks if, as some of you mentioned, there is some sort of an is-that-a-cute-fauna-in-your-pocket-or-are-you-just-happy-to-see-me equivalent. :)

52 N. Fritz 10.09.09 at 10:02 am

What is with all the mammary-phobia? It’s Breast Cancer Awareness month after all… people who keep hating on the “Save the Boobs” or “Save the Ta-Tas” campaign (or Cats ‘n’ Racks for that matter) should be ashamed of themselves and direct their attention to things that are really important.

53 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 10:03 am

@ Skippymom: The most stringently Hippie-qualified of my brothers (he even dropped outta college after one semester tho’ he was the Valedictorian
( & straight A’s without even tryin) of his graduation class in h. s., & is *vegan*, not “just” vegetarian, “YO” and he………….. oh, ok, you get the idea?)

(Actual given name) Steve (Native American given name — not kiddin’): Cheyenne

uses the following single word to sound Very Impressive & Philosophical when speaking with suits & “Normal ‘Mericuns”:

“Indeed. Indeed.”

That seems useful “at this juncture” :)

54 metsakins 10.09.09 at 10:05 am

Buns and buns?
buns and bulges?
pups & packages?
Pups and peens!

This stuff is great, I wish I could be so creative. Anybody got any more?

55 skippymom 10.09.09 at 10:05 am

I’ll have the steamed Theo with the deep-fried tofu.

56 Katrina 10.09.09 at 10:05 am

…and my favorite name for large breasts “gantse gazingers”. I echo what has been said before-wonderful things to have, to use and to admire. Now what is that, a cat?

57 annie 10.09.09 at 10:07 am

I vote for Pups’n Peens.

58 ffleur 10.09.09 at 10:09 am

can’t we all just get along?.

I pour oil on the water by submitting cute panda pictures but they don’t get posted. Its always kittens. Believe me, pandas are far less controversial. And cuter in my totally biased opinion….does Colbert work here? *suspicious eyes*

59 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 10:10 am

(oops, I said the “single word” that I promised(“indeed”), twice. Sorry, Grammar/ Proofreading Police. Oh, geez, now I’ve said the word THREE times.
“D’oh !” I blew it. Mea culpa !)

60 Beagler 10.09.09 at 10:13 am

But c’mon people. He looks like he’s going skydiving.

61 Lisa 10.09.09 at 10:13 am

gerbils and gazongas?
mammals and mammaries?
ferrits and funbags?

62 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 10:13 am

@ Skippymom: “oh no, you DI-unt, just mix up today’s Commentroversy, w/ YESTERDAY’s Commentroversy”????

GIRL …………you just lookin’ ta “Start it Up” !!!!!! (Rolling Stones earworm, courtesy of….i dunno, whatever they call that grey matter, up inside my head)

63 Lisa 10.09.09 at 10:13 am

stoats and scrotes? (did i just cross the line?)

[Well *snerk* let's just say *snikkr* I probably won't *bffph* be adding that tag *snggx* today, anyway... - Ed.]

64 doggabone 10.09.09 at 10:14 am

@Resriechan It was a single word, even if you used it twice. Some things are better in two’s even when they look identical.

65 pscaley 10.09.09 at 10:16 am

I have a complaint about this photo: the glare off the sunglasses or whatever on the side table there has made it hard to capture just how cute this cat-n-rack is.

66 Tony James 10.09.09 at 10:19 am

Hm…sweater puppies
Why boobies cause such alarm?
Bottle-baby much?

67 Stunbunny 10.09.09 at 10:20 am

YAY! Friday cats ‘n’ racks! I’m ready to go home now!

68 Kali 10.09.09 at 10:21 am

I can’t say I appreciate this one as much as the other Cats ‘n’ Racks. There’s just too much emphasis on the rack (as nice a rack as it is) and not enough on the adorable little guy. He’s not nestled in there, he’s dragging down her shirt and showing off her assets.

69 Sher 10.09.09 at 10:23 am

@Resriechan, so is your brother a Star Trek fan? That was sort of a Spock hallmark, huh?

70 heather 10.09.09 at 10:29 am

Hmmm, I thought the rack was great! And the kitteh looks hust like my Herschel did as a wee one.

Viva la racks!

71 gryt 10.09.09 at 10:30 am

Airbags, Prong? Really? The quality of the posts have started going downhill…

72 kookienoonie 10.09.09 at 10:30 am

Fake boobies not cute. No likey.

[Cute boobies not fake. Like noey. - Ed.]

73 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 10:30 am

@ Sher: actually, truth to tell, HE was already saying this, in the early 1970s when (ahem) the FIRST, original, Star Trek was just a wee spark in Spock’s eye. Like, 1972 & stuff.

However, if it is of any consolation to your great thought…I can offer the following, Our brother Greg, who is two years younger than Steve but 4 yrs older than me, was absoLUTEly a fan of the 1970s Star Trek show. However, he hid his enthusiasm from the Guys in the Locker Room, by referring to it, as “Star Blechh”
Yeah, we’re practically members of the Petrified Forest.

Hope that’s helpful !! Have a Spacey day & “thanks for playing with the show today” ! :)

Peace & fuzziness to All.
(“Indeed” #4)

74 boobs aren't cute 10.09.09 at 10:37 am

laaaaame..

75 AuntieMame 10.09.09 at 10:40 am

You two make a lovely pair, Jessie S.

I saw what you did there. *snicker*

76 mems13 10.09.09 at 10:44 am

http://mfrost.typepad.com/cute_overload/images/2007/09/01/1111176_img.jpg

This one will always be my favorite!

[Wow, that's a link to the OLD site! Amazing it still works. Here's the newer version, btw. - Ed.]

77 Andi from NC 10.09.09 at 10:46 am

Well, it is breast cancer awareness month so let’s turn this lemon into lemonade – ladies, grab you favorite kitteh and go get your mammogram!!!

78 kittykye 10.09.09 at 10:51 am

OMG!! @Lisa: “stoats and scrotes? (did i just cross the line?)”… HI-larious!!! I…. don’t know if I’d honestly ever want to see that post!

I think it’s funny how the women always get all hostile when there’s a cat-n-racks post. We just had one with the hot boy and the blue puppy, that Prongs posted on October 6th, that all the ladies went gaga for. :P Don’t really see how this is any different. Need to be fair to the boy viewers too!

79 260Oakley 10.09.09 at 10:52 am

How about Bats ‘n Balls?
Anybody?
It is playoff season.

80 Theo 10.09.09 at 10:54 am

LOL, Oakley, and also EEEEK

81 Lisa 10.09.09 at 10:57 am

Oakley – I see what you did there LOL

82 mems13 10.09.09 at 11:00 am

Hehe Thanks Ed! I was lazy and googled it…

Now… if only you would post the video I sent in… dooooo eeeeeeeeettttt….

o_O

[I ain't seen no vid; that's Meg's domain - Ed.]

83 mems13 10.09.09 at 11:04 am

*cries*
*whispers* clicky my name and go peek? It will make you giggle like a school girl ;)

84 skippymom 10.09.09 at 11:09 am

Bats ‘n Balls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Win!

85 AuntieMame 10.09.09 at 11:22 am

I’m wearing my Helton jersey, 260Oakley, so bring ‘em on! :D

86 Paul 10.09.09 at 11:28 am

Cats… boobs… Thank you!

And a lot of people suspect they’re fake. I vote for them being real and pushed up by the bra.

87 Aleutie 10.09.09 at 11:30 am

Why don’t we have any Cats ‘n’ Buttocks? No, seriously, just think about it.

88 victoreia 10.09.09 at 11:33 am

@Resriechan: Um, the original Star Trek aired from 1966 to 1969. (Jus’ sayin’)

(What do you mean, my ears are pointy? That is most illogical.)

89 N. Fritz 10.09.09 at 11:37 am

Theo: Thanks for the BCA link!

90 Michelle 10.09.09 at 11:43 am

Stop hating. They are all cute, but that kitten might be fake.

91 Bryn 10.09.09 at 11:58 am

Teho, you are slaying me today. Pulling out all the stops with your man hands. :D

[I tried a clever comeback. I failed. Ah well, I guess just Thanks. - Ed.]

92 Theresa 10.09.09 at 12:09 pm

@260Oakley, two things make me want to keell myself: A Yankees/Phils WS, and listening to Chip Caray call any game. :shock:

93 Theresa 10.09.09 at 12:12 pm

@Annie, what is your problem with overweight office ladies whose tatas hang down to their belly buttons? They have feelings, too. And don’t think as the years go by, your figure won’t change a leetle bit.

94 Holly 10.09.09 at 12:19 pm

Is “Prongs” capable of writing captions that aren’t skeazy, grating, and/or controversial? If not, hire someone else. This hit a new low.

[Guess what? Not up to you. - Ed.]

95 GreyandWhite Kitty 10.09.09 at 12:24 pm

I’m only 24 so i’m not hatin’ on perkiness. I just don’t want to see human bodies when i want to see cute animals!

96 Blondie 10.09.09 at 12:28 pm

@260Oakley: My whole office just looked at me like I was crazy as I BUSTED out laughing. Brilliant!

97 KittyAdventures 10.09.09 at 12:29 pm

Mewlings and Mamories.

Did we say that one already?

98 Blondie 10.09.09 at 12:37 pm

@GreyandWhite Kitty: I don’t think I’ve seen one post that doesn’t have a cute animal in it.

Every year I get my husband the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue. He browses it for the hot chicks, I browse it to find my next swimsuit. It’s all about looking at what you want to look at. If you don’t want to look at the boobs, don’t look at them. Just look at the pussy cat.

One year he bought a Porsche Calendar that had hot chicks draped all over the cars – I didn’t understand why he didn’t just get the Playboy Lingerie calender. I didn’t see one car in that Calendar. ;-)

99 BabyOpossum 10.09.09 at 12:38 pm

Hams ‘n’ mams?

Ferrets ‘n’ funbags?

Skunks ‘n’ skanks? (OK maybe not)

100 BeckyMonster 10.09.09 at 12:44 pm

Anyone who thinks that photo is “shopped” is an idiot. You have WAY too much faith/mystic belief in the power of Photoshop and it’s users. This is a “why would you bother” image from a daily “shopper”.

And please, stop being so boringly Puritanical. We suck on boobs for the first year of our lives TO SURVIVE AS A SPECIES.

Stop demonizing tits, for the love of all that is holy. It’s pathetic, small minded, and an insult to your MOTHER.

101 KittyAdventures 10.09.09 at 12:45 pm

BabyOpossum Snicker.

102 Katja 10.09.09 at 12:47 pm

I don’t understand the fuss about Prongs and her choice of hilariously double-meaning booby words. I actually lol’d when I got to the bit about the airbags behind the kitty. It’s a Cats ‘n’ Racks post! Not much point if you’re going to either ignore the rack part, or talk oh-so-PC about kitties smooshed between “human mammary glands.” Bring on the knockers and hooters! Huh. That makes me think of “Hooters ‘n’ Hooters”, but that sounds more terrifying and painful than cute…

103 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 12:52 pm

Yeah Annie, wait till yer bewbs hang low! That’s not nice.

I like what Trabbs Boy said. Don’t rip the girl to shreds people, geez!

Anyway, I like the rack. Hooray for racks! Pink ribbons for all.

104 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:03 pm

Huh, I’ve never heard a baby opossum snicker. :|

105 Jen 10.09.09 at 1:05 pm

The minute there’s a “Pups -n- Packages” category is the minute I stop saying ’nuff’ to Cats-N-Racks.

I’m not against sexuality, I just want parity. Bring it on, Meg!

And commenters PUH-LEEZE don’t give me a bunch of garbage about how women’s bodies are more beautiful/better to look at/etc. etc.

Men ARE gorgeous. Their bodies are gorgeous. Their faces are gorgeous. Every part of them is gorgeous.

It’s the media and cultural socialization that’s trained us not to see them in that way.

[Once more, with feeling... - Ed.]

106 BabyOpossum 10.09.09 at 1:15 pm

Why am I suddenly craving a Snickers bar?

[No idea. I've had this weird nagging jones for Sno Balls myself. :? - Ed.]

107 Isaac 10.09.09 at 1:18 pm

Skunks ‘n Punks?

think about it. :-)

108 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 1:20 pm

I sent my buddy a Halloween card that said “I got your fun sized treats right here”

It was a kitty with a litter box.

EW! LOL

109 Jen 10.09.09 at 1:23 pm

Once more, with feeling, Meg…

Non-sexualized, face-only shots of men in loose clothing are NOT the same as a close-up shot of a pair of breasts. It’s the difference between Rated R and Rated G.

Don’t toss your female readers a half-eaten Twinkie and try to call it a cupcake. We’ll call you on it every time.

[That was me, Theo, not Meg. And it was a pack of Sno Balls I tossed at you. Get it right. :P - Ed.]

110 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 1:24 pm

@ Victorea (sp?) — Said detail noted & written into the records.

HOWEVER said the (I can never remember whether it’s the prosecuting or the defense attorney who turns the whole court case upside down & inside out, after the other one seems to feel the entire course has been listed out & they don’t even NEED to call in a jury.

My entire family lived on a military base in Yokosuka Japan with *NOT ONE MINUTE* of American TV (no AFI military channel, even) until about January 1971.

(emptiness; sounds of crickets chirping)
And?

Does that help the case, at all?

Signed,
The Attorney.

111 Chipper 10.09.09 at 1:27 pm

::gets out the pupcorn::

this should be good..

112 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 1:28 pm

(ps: absolutely NO nastiness or harshness intended; really nothing truly negative at all in any way howsoever; I was just goin’ for the smart-alecky punchline…however the details are absolute. I have pictures of us in the military housing Yokosuka, from about that year)

jus’ sayin’ ;) Peace & point ears to all

113 sharkman 10.09.09 at 1:28 pm

Is “Prongs” capable of writing captions that aren’t skeazy, grating, and/or controversial? If not, hire someone else. This hit a new low.

[Guess what? Not up to you. - Ed.]

Okay, that’s the bestest, funniest Ed. smack down evar. You rock, Ed.!

114 AuntieMame 10.09.09 at 1:31 pm

Every part of them is gorgeous.

Um, no they’re not. I don’t want to see anyone’s genitalia.

(To be honest, I don’t want to see their feet, either. Or their elbows. Or their gall bladders. I could go on…)

115 AuntieMame 10.09.09 at 1:32 pm

Dammit, I turned OFF my italic tag! Why why why can’t we edit our own posts??? :(

[I got it. For the record, you closed your bold tag but missed your italic. ;) - Ed.]

116 Entropy's Bitch 10.09.09 at 1:33 pm

Stoats and scrotes. Right there, you gotcherself a winner. Or wiener..or…maybe that’s bats and balls.

I love Nuffer Friday.

I need to send a picture of my big ol’ kitty (cat, implied, thank you berry much) with my big ol…never mind…

117 carmen 10.09.09 at 1:35 pm

Wow, so not a fan of cat’n'racks. Sleezy.

118 Jen 10.09.09 at 1:36 pm

Why don’t you sign your comments “Mod” then? Isn’t Meg the editor of the site? I know, I know… “Not up to me.” I think you may have to put that on a t-shirt. It’s CO’s new catch phrase, like “Hell to the No” and Whitney Houston.

119 Babs 10.09.09 at 1:37 pm

Mmmm, Twinkies…

120 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:38 pm

“Ed.” is a common proofreader’s abbreviation for Editor. I suppose I could do “Mod”, but I started out the traditional way & prefer to stick with it.

Meg is the Founder and Fearless Leader. There is a hierarchy.

121 Camille 10.09.09 at 1:39 pm

@Auntie Mame – while I’ve never actually seen a cute gall bladder, I am not ruling out the possibility that one exists.

122 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:40 pm

…wait, our new catchphrase is “Whitney Houston”?? :?

Ironically, I think that’s pretty good. :lol:

123 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 1:42 pm

Now, Sno Balls are gross! You can peel that pink covered goo off of em and throw it at your sister…. King Dongs, on the other hand, were the snack cake of choice, back in the day!

Or those fruit pies, gah the sugar! Suuugar!!

124 skippymom 10.09.09 at 1:43 pm

AuntieMame, I’m with you on the naughty bits and the feet, but I wouldn’t mind checking out people’s gall bladders.

125 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:45 pm

:lol: “King Dongs” ?!! :lol:

oh I am dyin ovah heah

126 brinnann 10.09.09 at 1:45 pm

Jen, it’s [Ed.] as in [Edit], so signed because that particular line is an edit of the original post. Am I right, T[Ed.]?

127 skippymom 10.09.09 at 1:45 pm

Paunchie, um, “King Dongs”? Did you really have a snack called that? We didn’t have those….

128 brinnann 10.09.09 at 1:46 pm

Whoa, LOTSA posts between my (not usually) slow typingks and submittingks.

129 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 1:48 pm

Oh yes! Little chocolate cakes with creme filling, covered in a shell of chocolate!

They started out way back using the name Ding Dongs, then later changed it to King Dongs. They were good! Their logo was a little cupcake guy dressed up with a crown and a miter and a face of course.

Ding Dongs, LOL

130 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:49 pm

I think she may be referring to Ding Dongs. :D

(er, what Paunchie said)

131 Theresa 10.09.09 at 1:49 pm

…wait, our new catchphrase is “Whitney Houston”?? :?

@Theo, and IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIeeeeeeeeeeeeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIeeeeeeeeeeeeeeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII will always lu-huv, yoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowoah!

132 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:51 pm

@Theresa — I went looking for that Christian the Lion clip on YouTube, the one with the Whitney soundtrack, and it’d been pulled “due to terms of use violation”. And you can bet your bippy it wasn’t because of the video. :(

133 Bob 10.09.09 at 1:51 pm

Those are some nice….paws!!

134 Jen 10.09.09 at 1:51 pm

No, Theo. “Hell to the No” is Whitney’s catch phrase, silly!

135 Theo 10.09.09 at 1:51 pm

Well, darn.

136 Babs 10.09.09 at 1:52 pm

Don’t forget the Ho Ho’s.

137 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 1:58 pm

that’s them Teho, cept they did call em King Dongs where I lived. In some places he was called King Don Ding Dong, something like that.

Ho hos were good too. Can’t believe mom let us eat that stuff. And things like Count Chocula too! Ah the good ole 70s.

Don’t mess with Whitney! She cut a B -word (that’s from Kathy Griffin)

138 Ray 10.09.09 at 2:00 pm

WoW! Ed’s on a roll today.
(I’ll run outside for some more Sno Balls for ya’ since it snowed here today. Avoiding the yellow ones of course.)

I’d love to know the rate of nuffers-per-hour that we’ve had today.

continue party!

139 Theo 10.09.09 at 2:01 pm

@Ray — it hasn’t been too bad, actually.

140 Theresa 10.09.09 at 2:01 pm
141 Marie 10.09.09 at 2:03 pm

I wanted to write that I think fake racks should be ineligible for this category, but it might sound too mean. So I won’t. :D

142 Kelsey 10.09.09 at 2:07 pm

Swiss Cake Rolls trump Ho-Hos anyday. ;)

143 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 2:08 pm

FWIW– yup there either *were* or *are* specifically KING Dongs.

1:”Been there, eaten those,” specifically. I remember going thru the testing cycle of whether the KING Dongs or the Ding Dongs were better. If I recomember keerectly, my choice was for/ or were the King Dongs. Now wait just a minute; didn’t this commentroversy re. King Dongs, belong in YESTERDAY’S “fried butter & fried Twinkies” commentroversy? How did it get HERE?

2: I can provide some (sticky) documentation if you like; pretty sure that Aunt Ethel hasn’t cleaned out the woodshed yet, from that era. Y’know, the old wrappers? Saved ‘em, just in case they were gonna have a *Special Prize* Sweepstakes one day.

(Paragraph One: True. Paragraph Two: cow-hocky. Just kiddin about the wrappers)

144 GreyandWhite Kitty 10.09.09 at 2:08 pm

Blondie, that’s true, i should just focus on the thing i like in the picture. It just gets overwhelming at times. When it comes to your husband, I do not envy you. Everyone is different though.

145 Theo 10.09.09 at 2:09 pm

Aw screw all that snack-rack crap, I’m into the hard stuff. ;)

146 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 2:13 pm

Also @ Jen: May I make a request for clarification, please? I thought that Whitney Houston’s catchphrase supreme was

“Crack is whack.”
She used that statement, in order to reassure all of us, that *she* would *never* use cocaine ever no way huh-uh.
“to the best of my memory”

?????

147 Dianne 10.09.09 at 2:14 pm

OH BROTHER….Thanks, let’s just admit it. This pic has NOTHING to do with a cat. Is’nt there enough cute animals in the world that this could maybe be the one only place we could NOT have to look a someones boobs? Really frowning on Cute Overload right now :(

148 KittyAdventures 10.09.09 at 2:17 pm

Nuff is FFUN spelled backwards!

[...now why have I never seen that before?? - Ed.]

149 Paunchie 10.09.09 at 2:17 pm

OMG I did not just see what I think I saw at the cake wrecks! Gawd!!!

(heave!)

Who would order a cake like that!!! OMG. I don’t know whether to laugh or scream.

[Yes, that's it exactly. - Ed.]

150 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 2:24 pm

KittyAdv: you be one slammin’ smart person !! I do the whole look @ words backwared thing sometimes & all the times I’ve seen the word “Nuff” I NEVER noticed that before. Are you gonna sing “Somewhere over the rainbow” now?

Hope so !

And BTW folks (Including Hizzoner Theo), the little blue link that Theo put in at # 145 is outrageously wonderful: failures of prof. cakemaking. The first one in the pic is an old smelly galoshes cake. GREAT STUFF !!!

151 kittensnotkids 10.09.09 at 2:25 pm

TRABB’S BOY! Dickens reference ftw.

what a great choice of names to post under. Trabb’s Boy.
oh, bravo.

who can get riled up about racks n commentroversies when Trabb’s Boy is around, being a Dickens allusion? NOT ME.

152 Ray 10.09.09 at 2:36 pm

yeah, Paunchie,
the Cake Wrecks WAS pretty bad. But it was funny in a sick sort of way.

How on earth did you find that Theo? It’s not like you could google for something like that. I hope our Internets don’t get intercepted by (space) aliens. How would one explain these sorts of things?

[Well, Cake Wrecks won a bunch of blog awards in '09 and '08, and Cute Overload travels in those circles too. ;) - Ed.]

153 Jen 10.09.09 at 2:38 pm

@Resriechan

2nd item down

H to the N is a pretty commonly associated phrase with Ms. H.

154 Fleurdamour 10.09.09 at 2:43 pm

When you say, “You make a lovely pair,” are you talking to the cat and the lady, or to…oh, never mind,

[Short answer: YES - Ed.]

155 Mary 10.09.09 at 2:59 pm

How many idiots are going to say that those breasts are fake? They don’t look fake to me, they look like a nice set of perky breasts on a young girl. They aren’t even big enough to look obviously fake. She’s wearing a bra that’s holding them up and they happen to have a nice shape. So why all the fake cries? I’ll tell you why. Women are catty and jealous and when they see a nice set of breasts on another woman. They cry fake to make themselves feel better about themselves and they’re own breasts that they are obviously not happy with. And I know this from experience as I happen to have quite a large set of breasts (natural) on a tiny frame. I can’t even begin to tell you the grief I have gotten from women because of what the good lord gave me.

156 Theo 10.09.09 at 3:02 pm

[stepping slowly and quietly away]

157 Ray 10.09.09 at 3:16 pm

[tosses Sno Ball to Theo for self-defense, and tip-toes away too]

158 KittyAdventures 10.09.09 at 3:17 pm

I have been following Cake wrecks for a while..
THere are some wickedly bad cakes in there.

Wickedly bad LOL

159 seigaiha 10.09.09 at 3:34 pm

LONG LIVE CATS N RACKS

I love both subjects, AND im a girl :D you people have way stress if you are offended by something as simple as this xD

160 googlie eyes 10.09.09 at 3:47 pm

Normally I like the parity argument, but I actually disagree that images of racks are more sexually charged than a puppy on a partially exposed ‘package.’ Unfortunately that would bring up a whole different set of culturally implications (not nearly as cute and cuddly). There is an element of nurturing underneath the idea of holding something to your breast that isn’t there with the male counterpart. That’s the reality of it, unfortunately. I think that nixes the ’stoats and scrotes’ idea (the cute factor, anyway), much as I think that’s hilarious!

161 googlie eyes 10.09.09 at 3:48 pm

‘cultural,’ not ‘culturally.’ Sorry about that.

162 Allie 10.09.09 at 3:52 pm

I love you, cats ‘n’ racks category, both because kitties and boobies are two of my very favorite things and because of the hilarious complaining you inspire. <3

163 browngrl 10.09.09 at 4:15 pm

Well, I am disappointed. I have been thinking up “snappy” comments for the next commentroversy,but the nuffers are not being nuff enough. The photo is not disturbing enough for me to nuff. All in all, I am all out of sorts and am forced to use my witty/cutting/completely inappropriate comments on my husband and cats (who have wisely used the time I have been typing to disappear).

164 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 4:42 pm

browngrl: well, usu. a husband and cats *expect* you to either purchase or create wondrous meals, for them to eat. Won’t they come a-knockin’ or a-meowin atcha when their bellies need kibble? You can let’em have your repressed irritation then.

Signed,
Hope that helps for your therapeutic needs.

165 Metz 10.09.09 at 4:46 pm

@kittyadventures LOL! Hey you’re right! And Nuffs put the F- in Ffun! :-D

oh, and my suggestion for alternatives to Cats n racks,

Snakes and well, um, Snakes.
Pets and Peters (what? Been done already?)
Jerboas and Johnsons
/Ok why does Firefox think that Jerboas might possibly be a mispelling of Riverboats???/
Anyway, this last one doesn’t rhyme but I’m gonna toss it out there anyhoo, “Lucky Laps”. On account of those laps are lucky to have cute cuddly critters on them. Oh never mind. :-P

166 MLO 10.09.09 at 4:48 pm

*looks around*

Tabbies and…’taints?

*crickets*

Okay…too much…I understand…

167 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 4:51 pm

Wow, Theo (re. item # 157)

now THAT’s a particularly strategic method of coping with a statement, that I NEVER woulda thought you chose.

Very very restrained & diplomatic. Plus, it’ll keep the tire tracks off your Friday night shirt. She can run over somebody ELSE tonight !!!!

I immediately thought of police officers or whoever (CSInvestigators, sheriffs, rent-a-cops; you get the drift) on television programs, where the Head Good Guy pulls out his gun & says :

“Sir/ Ma’am (always start an order/ command with a submissive, honorific term) I must ask you, to STEP AWAY from the
(package of lifesavers, bomb, fluffy wig,,,,,,,; you get the drift here, as well, I suppose)
“or I will have to shoot you.” :)

GOOD CHOICE there, my man!!

168 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 4:51 pm

Metz: I just cracked up at Jerboas and Johnsons!
Resriechan: You made me lol with that “emptiness…crickets chirping” thing!

I can’t think of any alternatives myself. My brain is too tired from work I guess.

169 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 4:54 pm

MLO: He-he. ‘taints. Is that the area of the female anatomy that’s between umm …things in the nether region?

170 MLO 10.09.09 at 4:56 pm

Yup. That’d be the area.

Though I’ve most often heard the term in reference to the male anatomy…

171 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 4:59 pm

MLO: Yeah, I suppose it could work either way. ‘Taint here nor there.

172 Lizzy 10.09.09 at 5:14 pm

Ferrets and funbags!? Yes, yes, a thousand times yes!!

173 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 5:20 pm

Greetings QoD;

pourquoi il n’y pas rien de correspondence dans mon Clearwire, que tu m’as ecrit?

;) ;)

174 Theo 10.09.09 at 5:30 pm

Hey, don’t mock the Sno Balls. I’m like Snack Ninja with these things.
[hefts a shurikoconut]

175 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 5:32 pm

Hi Resriechan

Check Clearwire for correspondence? Please excuse my ignorance but I don’t know how. (wincing and kind of shrinking with embarassement). T isn’t even here to help.

[I know nothing of this "Clearwire" you refer to. If you mean me. - Ed.]

176 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 5:39 pm

nonno you ain’t got no kinda ignerance there, young lady (my misspellings here were purposeful & intended for goofy effects)….

That thar qu. was……….(oh, in ENGLISH, you mean? Well, why didn’t you TELL me that you aren’t fluent in French. I think you know EV-erything,so why….

oh. ok. The point is, I checked MY clearwire account, looking for emails FROM your email to me I got two initially the other night; the test msg & one other. I had kinda hoped, that after I got home from rescuing the person I was rescuing TODAY (sigh at the weight of the world so full of those who need rescuin’ but aren’t cute/fluffy/four-legged people who MEOW so it would at least be FUN to rescue them….oh, sorry, got offtrack again) …….that I’d open up my email (now that I know you have my emailable thinggie …..and THERE would be a 49 page dissertation about your life & who took you to the Third Grade Prom & comparing the levels of Pinkness you have & Tara has, in combinea’;l ///

oh, sorry, got carried away again. Anyway, I was hopin to see enough reading material from you THERE, to keep me reading all weekend. We gotta do 80 % of our socializin THERE. Unless, that is, you wrote me the dissertation into the CuteTalk accounts that you & I both set up the other night.

177 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 5:39 pm

@ Ed: no, you’re just dandy-fine but thanks for thinking thru that possibility!
Smooches to all COers.

178 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 5:49 pm

Resriechan: Oh. I will write to you on Cute Talk this weekend! That’s very easy! I’m by no means fluent in French although I new a great deal of German when I lived there 100 years ago. But it seems if you don’t use something like that you lose it over the years.
Ed: Is this Theo or NTMTOM? Anyway, didn’t mean to call you Clearwire! :)

[Mike usually signs as "Mike", FYI - Ed.]

179 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 5:50 pm

oops. I meant “knew not new”

*blush*

180 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 5:58 pm

@ QoD: but, I thought you were only just 23. How could you have been in Germany 100 years ago? Do you use a time machine?

181 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 5:58 pm

ps the blush is very becoming, btw

182 Happycat 10.09.09 at 5:58 pm

Prongs…’rib-bumpers’..snerk! good one! keep on keepin’ on!

183 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 6:09 pm

Resriechan: I’ll be 45 next week! Woo-hooo!!! I wish I did have a time machine though.

184 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 6:16 pm

Oh ! Now see, I TOLD you you couldna’ been in Germany 100 years ago. Obvy you’re better at dancing than arithmetic !!!!

If you can at the moment, open up the CT thinggie. Tonight is fairly good for me. Honestly very often I turn my little laptop off for the entire wkend. Tonight I do have somewhat a migraine, from my rescue adventures “herding cats” activities today.

Or, if things make more sense otherwise, I’ll prob have more time tomorrow. I want a fully documented medical first in your data, please maam.
Oh, and glad you enjoyed my “Court Reporting” (crickets) bit. You’re the best.
(I would hazard a guess that the mod. of the moment might be a Mike or a Prongs but that is not certain; just inferring…)

185 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 6:38 pm

Ceeerrrrraaappp! Resriechan: I was so totally in the middle of writing to you on Cute Talk. I got this little floaty message saying that my “battery was low,” which I totally didn’t understand because this computer is plugged into the wall. I thought it was some glitch but then the computer just went black and died. I looked under the desk and realized T had unplugged the computer to plug in the printer. ( I really must invest in a surge protector with lots of outlets). Good grief. I’m going to write you again on CT.

186 Resriechan 10.09.09 at 6:45 pm

thanks for the momentary update about the trials & trib’ s of Life With (or, sometimes, without!) Computers. They do aggravating things to me several times a day.

It’s a Computer Conspiracy, I tell ya !! I’m in gear & ready when it all catches up. I’ve already brought up my CT thinggie.
Smooches.

187 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 7:03 pm

Resriechan: Cool! I’ve sent you a message!!! Did ya get it?!!

188 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 7:27 pm

Resriechan: I’ve also sent you a message on Clearthing! (I feel so clever right now) ;)

189 Theo 10.09.09 at 7:35 pm

You realize, don’t you, that you’re sending Leslie messages about your messages? Meta-messages, as it were?

…which makes this comment a double-meta-message. Mmm, minty! :mrgreen:

190 Jay 10.09.09 at 7:41 pm

OK it may be lack of sleep or the cold medicine I just took, but this picture soet of freaked my out . Not because of the boobage but I’m getting this optical illusion effect when staring at the picture.

If you stare directly at the center of her cleavage until your eyes start to bur it looks like her breasts become concave.

I definitely need to go bed.

191 Theo 10.09.09 at 7:47 pm

If you stare directly at the center of her cleavage until your eyes start to bur

Well THERE’S yer problem. «/jamiehyneman»

192 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 7:55 pm

Theo: Huh?! Have I done somthing wrong and screwed up? (Wouldn’t surprise me). I was just trying to write…

[No, I just thought it was funny. - Ed.]

193 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 7:59 pm

Anyway…off to bed now.

194 Queen of Dork 10.09.09 at 8:17 pm

Ed: Oh! okay then. Bye! I’m totally going to bed now. I just watched an episode of Brady Bunch where Mr. Brady’s tie was Huge. Like wider than his whole head. That pushed me over the edge and I’m seepie seepie tie tie girl now. Wow. Huge, wide ties. The ’70s. Whoooaaaa.

195 doggabone 10.10.09 at 10:14 am

Hours late to the snack cake but … There were King Dons, Ding Dongs, and Big Wheels, all by Hostess, until 1987 when Hostess consolidated the brand name. The Big Wheels brand on the east coast was to avoid product confusion with Ring Dings by Drake’s Cakes. Now, Interstate Bakeries owns Hostess and Drake’s.

Now, I have to unlearn all this stuff I just learned. ;)

King Dons, Ding Dongs and Big Wheels.

I also advise strongly against Googling for “King Dongs”, by the way. *cough*

196 pinkmariposas 10.10.09 at 10:22 am

not cute or attractive at all

just tacky T&A type post not a fan!

197 Amanda 10.10.09 at 10:43 am

Disgusting nails and ugly clothes = TACKYOVERLOAD
…it’s not even a good kitten picture, you can’t even see the kitten face, just the iternal ear stuff

198 Leila 10.10.09 at 1:31 pm

eeew yucky nails!! the kitten must be really embarrassed

199 holligans 10.10.09 at 2:18 pm

Gaaaahhh! LOVED the “Cake Wrecks” site! Thanks so much, Theo!!!

200 Teresa 10.10.09 at 8:03 pm

That kitty, Spike, looks to me like someone put him in a baby sling not a shirt until I took a second look :) Yeah, it is a shirt and kitty is debating how to get out :twisted:

201 Teresa 10.10.09 at 8:04 pm

Please don’t get mad at me :( The black top the lady is wearing makes it hard to tell what she has on underneath except for the bathing suit top :(

202 Kodalai 10.10.09 at 9:25 pm

I cannot believe, after all of the famous commentroversies that have been on this site, that people STILL get up in arms over freakin’ cats-n-racks. PG-13 site, people; get over or get out.

Re the picture: The appearance of breasts when shaped by bras/tight clothing is not indicative of their state of realness vs. silicon. Now, if we saw her lying down, but the boobs were standing up, then there might be some reason to suspect silicon.

203 moog 10.11.09 at 10:21 am

is there always controversy over cats n racks, or are there just a lot of new people here?

I’m thinking it’s the latter…

204 moog 10.11.09 at 10:22 am

also, the only thing I’m offended by here is the in depth discussion about real vs. fake breasts. It’s completely nasty and misogynistic and you should be ashamed of yourself for focusing on it. go outside. :)

205 Queen of Dork 10.11.09 at 10:48 am

This has not yet been put to bed? People. It’s a picture of a kitten stuffed into the shirt of a human female wearing a bathing suit. What the f___ is the problem? Move on. Go have popcorn and tea and stop worrying about this stupid picture.

The End.

206 Queen of Dork 10.11.09 at 11:55 am

Ummmmm. wow. *stepping away from room. child has her own thoughts on things (which is good!)*

207 Paunchie 10.11.09 at 1:36 pm

I think if your battery is low, that means you need puddingks. Or tasty Hostess snack cakes!

Or else you need to stuff a fuzzy kitty in yer shirt.

208 LisaL 10.11.09 at 7:35 pm

Lol… CO commentroveries FTL.
Seriously ppl, Cats N Racks has been around probably longer than some of you have been coming to this website.
OMG covered boobs! Let’s make a deal out of it! But wait! What’s that? A cute guy in a photo? Lets act like horny old women who never saw a guy before!

209 Andrea 10.13.09 at 9:46 am

The first thing people thought was fake? o_O

Mine are way bigger than this (naturally; scaled down from natural, actually) and my first thought was “Those aren’t big enough for a kitty to snuggle up in!”.

Going to go take a picture of my buns in my blouse now. =D

[Make sure you use a good camera, and frame the shot well, then... ;) - Ed.]

210 Karen 10.15.09 at 6:17 pm

I thought this site was called cuteoverload, not skankoverload.

211 Bree 10.20.09 at 4:02 pm

i think girls are annoying and catty when they get down on other girls for being cute/hot/etc. this lady’s breasts are super nice and beautiful and the kitty is cute. it makes you all look really insecure when you rip on her, her nail polish, her boobs… get over it, you know it makes you wet and you know her boobs are enviable. (p.s. i’m a girl)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: