Comments on: Quacks ‘n’ Racks!!!

By: as

as — Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:08:31 +0000

she's a wannabe actress and this is her 15 minutes of game. makes sense.

that's what i don't like about these "____ and rack" posts. they are attention whore galore.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:17:12 +0000

Lucky duck!

By: crazyweinerdoglady

crazyweinerdoglady — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:30:03 +0000

Well I won’t be so high and mighty that I won’t apologize for what I said. I am truly sorry for the comments I made and admit I was having a bad day and took it out on someone else. Forgive please

By: amber

amber — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:48:33 +0000

OMG I just watched that video and I am laughing so hard I am crying!! It’s nice to know Cute Overload fans are so talented!

By: MATT

MATT — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:29:04 +0000

ANIMALS ARE NOT CUTER IN CLEAVAGE. SERIOUSLY, THIS IS DUMB.

By: wannadance

wannadance — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:34:14 +0000

well, miss brittany, good on you for taking care of this baby so nicely.
you are a lovely young woman and that is a sweetie little ducky...
i love to carry babies around in my 'rack'. drop fritos and chips down there, too, it's like grand canyon, ya know??
kisses!

By: Paunchie

Paunchie — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:37:00 +0000

He settled down once he felt her heartbeat. Ahn... (head tilt)

By: Helene

Helene — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:49:10 +0000

Meg doesn't need to be concerned about page views.

By: Amy R

Amy R — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:12:06 +0000

Um, Erin. I don't really think Meg is *that* concerned about pageviews.

By: Erin

Erin — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:52:28 +0000

Meg does this for pageviews. Nothing more, nothing less.