Cute Overload :D
SOMEONE’S been caught with PUG PR0N!!! OMG.
Well, at least it’s Pugs, not Jugs. Right, Andrea L.?
OH my what is this world coming to ??????????
*rolling up newspaper*
Bad, bad dog!!!
well at leeast his or her face can’t get any redder or can it ?????
Puppeh says, “I don’t know how this picture came up. I was looking for cute overload, honest.”
Has the world gone topsy-turvy? I could’ve sworn there were pandas earlier. And i think i saw a “comments closed” sign before anyone could comment on a couple of other pics!
Is it Armageddon????? what the heck is going on in CO-land?!?
not just pug porn, gay pug porn. http://wherearethedogshumping.com/
Pugs ‘n Jugs would be an excellent new category!
knowing what website they’re looking at makes me feel like i spend way too much time on the internet.
it’s a comic website from the guy who does toothpastefordinner.com.
LOL at this pic… I actually think the pup looks like he is thinking “Nah Man… that’s not cool Pumping Pugs”
EW. Dis not Cute.
*angry cat voice* OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH ma dawg.
that reminds me, i knows what that dog is thinkin…
WHY I EYES YA!!
this site is CuteOverload.
this pic is NOT cute in any way I can figure out.
send it straight to Gee-ross!
AHHH!! THATS NOT HOW YOU GIVE PUGGY BACK RIDES!!! :o
After all mom spent on NetNanny®!
tee hee. adorable.
Meg, how could you? You’re obviously promoting promiscuity as well as unsafe sex before marriage. Some unsuspecting CHILD may come to your site and have terribly uncomfortable questions for their parents! Think of the awkward positions you’re putting these people in.
L. O. L. at Squirly!
And people…this is just a fact of life. Doggies will be doggies.
looks like someone has a pug fetish 0___o
Easy there, puppy… you’ll go blind.
Puppy popping balloons comments close, pandas disappear into thin air, butterflies are sucking turtle eyeballs, and now pug pr0n! Did I happen into an alternate universe?
… I’ve been watching too much Dr. Who…
Why is that dog giving a piggy back ride?
And why is the other dog watching?
omg that’s soo sad. =[[
awww man what kind person??
Aww…sweet chubby pug puppehs under construction…!
…just hope dey is legal age, or this is kitty puppy porn, and we’s all in trouble!
Oooh, I wanna be watching too much Dr who. But they edit the stuff we get stateside and the sets are a bajillion dollars :(
I’d warn him about getting hairy palms, but…
Cute overload- WHAT is with the Asian girl “dating” crap ad on the sidebar? Joking about doggie porn is one thing, having “girls” listed by age, weight and number is another. This is the kind of thing that would make a loyal reader not want to come here anymore. Not a prude, just want to escape from this sort of thing and be charmed by cuteness when I come here.
Thanks for considering my opinion.
Also, this is the link to the panda picture, not sure why it was deleted… Though if I remember correctly a Panda photo was attributed to this person in the past and there was “who really took it” debates going… Could be legalities.
As for the closed comments, they’d already had vaguely obscene and certainly rude huffs, so maybe they just felt like nipping it in the bud.
I’m not sure what choices there are about the ads. I, for one, rarely notice them. Some people have said that it depends on the browser you have.
Yay wherearethedogshumping.com!! That site is hilarious as are Drew and Natalie Dee’s other comics! :D I’m glad others here recognized it, too!
Also, I hadn’t seen that panda photo until now, but I wish it hadn’t been deleted! :( So cute!
zOMG, puggy puppy pr0n!
oh, now this is sick. children, avert your eyes…
This site has gone to the dogs. :P
I had to post that quick before I lost my bad joke nerve.
it’s by the guy who does the toothpaste for dinner comics.
if that is a rough-coated dachshund, i shall splode right here and now
i la me some rough-coated dachshund
Cute overload- WHAT is with the Asian girl “dating” crap ad on the sidebar?
—I have to TOTALLY agree with you.
Next time, could we please have a work-safe spelling of pr0n?
My Daily CO email got blocked by work’s filters, and that’s just not cool.
R. Moore, that’s why god invented Netflix! And BBC America ;)
p.s. for those concerned about the Chinese mail order bride ads, and other questionable ads. I remember Theo explaining a few posts back that CO uses an ad service, and sometimes those sneaky raunchy ads use fake keywords to trick the ad service into posting them. And from what i remember, the CO overlords have been complaining about it, and I’m sure they’re just as concerned. The best thing we can do is not click on them, and hopefully they’ll be able to filter them out soon!
Ruh Roh!!! Caught red-faced! (That puppeh does have reddish fur anyway!)LOL.
As for the distasteful ads – fortunately I don’t seem to be getting any. I do get ads for networking sites based in my country, so I guess it also depends on the geography.
What Taj said above is correct, Teho explained sometime back about the sneaky advertisers using fake keywords, and yes, Meg had complained about it too.
Interrupter: (walking into the room) “Did you put your laundry in the…
Puppeh: “OH-EM-GEE, Mom! What are you doing!? Get out!”
Interrupter: “Ah, um. I’m sorry. Oh no. I’ll..I’ll…just leave.” (quickly leaves room, closes door)
I dunno if it’s a rough doxie or not, Blair. I thought the culprit looked an awful lot like my red tri Australian Shepherd girl (who was prone to naughtiness as well).
Haha, naughty doggy…
I know this dog! And this picture! And that office! Woooohoooo!
This dog belongs to one of the managers of our doggie daycare. He is a miniature Australian Shepherd, though “miniature” is a relative term. I’d say he weighs about 25-30 lbs.
Adblock ftw. you can one-click to get those pesky ads away forever.
The Pug at the front is blind and the Pug at the back is pushing him all the way to St Dunstans. (hospital for the blind)
It saddens and troubles me to see animals exploited like this. This is not humor, but juvenile and distasteful.
Just get Firefox and Adddblock plus and you’ll never be bother by mailorder bride ads again. Or any other advertisment for that matter. Of course, now we could discuss: In doing so, are we closing our eyes to the harsh reality of women selling themselves to be mailorder brides?
Bow chicka wow wow.
(Julia, seriously? Chill out).
How exactly does this belong on cuteoverload?
A couple of things.
1) People, this is a blog. It belongs to Meg. She decides what pictures are posted here. If Meg’s ideas of cute don’t exactly coincide with yours, that’s sad for you, but not a national tragedy. No doubt there will be something cuter tomorrow.
2)I have never seen an unsavory ad here, and that is probably because I don’t use IE. Get FireFox with AdBlocker, or Opera, and CuteOverload will again be pure as the driven.
Or use NoScript with Firefox. You can block all ads, scripts etc.
Currently it is blocking on this site: sitemeter.com; googlesyndication.com; adbrite, blogads, ning.com; quantserve and some other stuff pops up now and then on this site… why so much?!?
this is sort of annoying. i love cutoverload (obviously) but having things like this disappoints me. i’m a KID. hello? this is a website for cute pictures, not sick ones. the ads are not cuteoverload’s fault, pictures like this are. they should not be on here. i’m willing to bet there’s a huge kid demographic and most of them, like me, will never come here again. THIS IS NOT CUTE. (i know shouting is rude, but so is putting up pictures like these).
In regards to the nuffs about the pugging going on… Fact of Life: all animals have sex, humans too o.O — it’s nature, fact of life — if you don’t have sex, that’s not our problem, nor the pugs problem — they are following nature’s law ;)
rats, somebody beat me to the bow chika wow etc…
lover of cuteoverload, where did you get the idea that this site is family friendly? It’s been said over and over again that it’s PG-13 at least.
And this site isn’t a public service, you can’t demand that they post what you want. If you don’t like what you see, get out and make your own website.
Man, when I was a kid I would have been giggling like a maniac if I saw this image, not upset.
What are we teaching our children these days, that dogs getting frisky makes them flounce away instead of go “Ewwwww! Neat! >:D”?
heh heh, doggie style… I’m so sorry, I just couldn’t help it! ::gigglesnort::
Well I’M a kid too. Hello? And I think that posts like this are educational and very important for my growth as an adult. After all, if I can’t handle the p-word and seeing a coupla pooches doin’ what they do best – well, THEN my parents have something to worry about.
(oh, p.s. – lover of cute, I’m *pretending* to be a kid to make a silly point – just like youuuu! Good job.)
I was talking with a friend, and he said that if you hit on enough links, you will eventually end up on some porn site. I didn’t know there was a doggie porn site!
Ah, you funny Americans:
Having weapons and using them is okay, but sex is evil.
How strange are you priorities.
I think this is a tad offensive….
Offensive? Maybe, to some people. Whatever. It’s also funny to some people. It’s good that we don’t all like the same things, eh? Good to have variety.
Yep, Meg can put whatever she wants on this site, and most of the pics are wonderful, like the turtle/butterfly meeting. Nor is this lapse in taste particularly offensive or troubling. Still, one must wonder why it needs to be here at all. Yeah, we all know that critters copulate, and the Web is full of such images. But one longs for a repository of cuddly luvpics devoid of sex & bodily functions. No prude here, just thinking of my little kids & my grandparents. Kids are confused about sex & may find it disturbing. Let’s give them time to develop on their own terms. And some of the elderly are simply no longer able to enjoy the pleasures of sexual loving, and so may be saddened by a remembrance of same.
Again, Meg can do what she likes, and this is not really a chastiesment so much as a call to someone else–someone with time & energy–to put up a site that is completely G-rated. Let the kids & elders look at cute pics of puppehs & kittehs without having to visualize genitalia.
Here come the outraged responses calling me a prude or a nuffer. Fine. But perhaps someone will heed the call for constructing a site with impeccable taste.
meg’s an evil genius, that’s all i have to say.
Sounds like more than a few commenters could use a screening of “Fuzzy Bunny’s Guide to You-Know-What.”
And I second the Pugs ‘n Jugs category. ;) lol.
I do find it funny that many people seem to be worried about the children. As a child I was pretty much only allowed to watch educational programs on TV, which included many many documentaries on assorted wild animals. I can tell you that almost every documentary included images of animals mating. I was never confused by this, or upset by the animals wanton scandalousness. I just knew this is how you got baby animals (as that is what inevitably came next in the documentary). But perhaps I was a little more aware of the real world of animals as I also grew up on a farm. As a previously dewy-eyed farm girl with lambs and piglets I can tell you that I was quite aware of where they came from.
At some point, parents gotta explain where all those adorably cute puppies come from….
I don’t find anything offensive, upsetting, or risque about dogs behaving like dogs. I guess that’s how I was raised.
people give it a rest its a web site and Meg and Maybe Theo (when bounce permits) but up stuff on this site.
Its here to look at and comment but did’t your momma tell if you if you have nothing nice to say say nothing at all!!!!
P.S. Bounce is one of Theo”s kittehs…
Pauline, try the links on the side bar to The Daily Kitten, the Daily Puppy, Hamster Tracker, Kitten War, etc. Those are more along the lines of what you’re looking for. Unfortunately, you won’t find Meg’s & Theo’s witty senses of humor there, which is what makes this site doubly great.
Thanks, Brinnann, for the tip about Daily Kitten, etc. I’ll try them. And I think I can live without the “wit” of Meg & Theo, who put me in mind of a guffawing conventioneer with a squiritng flower in his lapel
[I think you'd find the reality different from this impression, but after all this *is* the internet... and naturally your preferences are completely up to you. Cheers. - Ed.]
leah b., I believe Thumper said it first, and I agree. We’re guests here. I’d like to be invited back.
“And some of the elderly are simply no longer able to enjoy the pleasures of sexual loving, and so may be saddened by a remembrance of same.”
Pauline – I highly doubt that seeing a photo of two pugs humping would make an elderly person get wistful about their own sexuality. Let’s give the elderly some credit.
Seriously, lighten up. Don’t judge us who like this site by saying we’re tasteless.
MMc, I didn’t see that one, it’s hilarious!
Thanks Pauline. I hadn’t visualized puppy “bits” until you said something. I still think the photo is cute and funny though.
I think it’s the prudies that think the photo is offensive. If they were gettin’ some IRL, they wouldn’t be all mad that the doggies are doin’ it. lol (I’m just makin’ fun, lighten up people!)
Is it spring already? Don’t look! That flower is exposing his sex parts in broad daylight! omg now there’s a dirty little honeybee getting in on the action! What is the world coming to?
Okay, I got everything up until this point “…BBQROTFLMFO”.
Please enlighten me!
Holy cow! Two Michelles posting at one time. I’ll label myself “michelle 2″.
OK, here it goes…
Oh My God What The Frack(1) BBQ (as in BBQ, just an expression)Rolling On The Floor Laughing My Fracking (forget the A for Ass(2) obviously) Off
(1) I used Battlestar Gallactica’s take on the F word instead of the real thing.
(2) And by ass, I mean donkey.
NSFW but pretty darn funny regardless.
Okay! Use “BBQ” in a sentence so I get it and can be cool too.
Like…”Are you kidding me??? BBQ me sideways!”
Or something :-)
What do you mean NSFW? Pup #2 is giving the Heimlich maneuver to pup #1. That’s all there is to it, really! :D
LOL Michelle 2, sorry, can’t help much more there, English isn’t my first language. But I love your example!
But I did find this :
The use of “BBQ” is just to make fun of the use of acronyms on the internet. So when you find yourself using a lot of acronyms, just throw in “BBQ” for fun!
Really, Pauline? ‘Cause I distinctly and unfortunately remember walking in on my 87-year-old grandparents when I was a kid. Just because they have the grace not to talk about it 24/7 doesn’t mean it’s not happening behind closed (and from now on, hopefully locked) doors.
“some of the elderly are simply no longer able to enjoy the pleasures of sexual loving, and so may be saddened by a remembrance of same.”
*SPORFLE* I definitely just sprayed my laptop screen with soda, ahahaha. We ARE looking at the same photo of two pugs gettin’ it on, aren’t we? O.o
I think this post is cute and amusing, and second the motion for a screening of “Fuzzy Bunny’s Guide to You-Know-What.”
Raven, I’m delighted to hear that your GPs were horny old geezers. May all of us enjoy the same friskiness as we lurch into our dotage. My point was simply that some of the elderly have moved beyond sex for reasons they cannot control, and so might feel unhappy being reminded of it. That’s not hard to grasp, right?
As usual, the CO cutesie crowd shows itself unable to process any criticism at all, and tries to paint the critic as a grouch. I have no illusions that Meg & Theo will tailor the site to fit my particular preferences, nor should they. (Had I the time & energy I would create a CO clone without the few elements I don’t find uplifting, like humping mutts & half-drowned bunnies.) But it would be nice if a bit of criticism could be offered without people telling me to “lighten up.” My whole being lightens up when I see 90% of the pics on this site. That’s why I come here.
Pug #2 is clearly faking it.
Hey pauline, your line re. elderly (“…simply no longer able to enjoy the pleasures of sexual loving, and so may be saddened by a remembrance of same”) was HI-fracking-LARIOUSOMGWTFBBQPONIEZ!!!!1!! Made me imagine a little old lady in her rocking chair, sighing to herself and reminiscing about the good old days when she was limber enough to do it doggy-style…
Hadn’t thought of that particular “angle.”
Dexter, love your comment!
Pauline, where do you see half-drowned bunnies?? You must have a really weird mind.
Helene, I think Pauline is referencing a post from last week (I think) with a bunny being given a bath.
Which leads me to wonder, given all of the nuffs crying, “How can you be amused by this?” in those wet animals posts (for the record, Pauline, I’m not calling you a nuff here, promise!)…are wet animals the C.O. equivalent of dead baby jokes?
OMG, you know what I didn’t need? The visual of 80+ grandparents doing what married couples are wont to do. My EYES!
Also, where I work (a publicly funded institution) this is not only SFW but liable to be posted in the back room by someone. It would be taken down, of course, but then it would likely replace a picture of someone’s face on the wall…
Without doggies procreatin’ we would not have puppehs to snorgle. The cuteness is not about the “porn” on the monitor, but the look on the dog’s face. He looks just like someone caught him redhanded doing something he shouldn’t be doin’. Heck, your kids could walk down the street and run into a scene just like that one. I don’t think anyone has a law against dogs makin’ babies on the street.
Jupiter, I figured she meant that post, and that’s what made me laugh. It’s a pet getting a bath fer crying out loud.
Yeah, I personally agree ^_^. Sorry, hard to communicate tone on the internet, right? So I thought it was an honest question. Meh, I say, bring on mmore half-drowned cute animals!
I just saw Pauline’s comments in the bunny post, and they were hilarious! What are you still doing here Pauline?
here’s to those who agree that “taste” is overrated!
…and to prudes who really are delusional enough to believe they’re not prudes at all.
Think of the children!…(but not how they get here.)
and to think it all began with a simple, innocent question:
“mama, where do puppies com from?”
A while back, cuteoverload posted a marriage proposal (and acceptance) via kitty.
Using the logic quoted above, it must have also been IN BAD TASTE to post the proposal, since there are a lot of people who have lost a spouse, or can’t marry for some reason, and might “have been saddened by the remembrance of same.”
Oddly enough, I don’t remember anyone making that argument at the time. Hmm.
This picture has nothing to do with procreation, folks. If you do the smallest bit of investigating, you’ll find that Charles and Chester are both males. Screw the children(not literally), I’m offended on my own behalf. This is an abomination. I’m just glad they don’t have the right to marry.
Ok I think the anti-nuffers are getting a bit mean now. I don’t agree with Pauline, but I don’t like seeing her get this kind of treatment either.
Also, sex and p0rn are not one and the same thing. Sex is a fact of life, p0rn offends a significant segment of the population. I too grew up with “Where did I come from?” books but I did not grow up looking at p0rn.
I enjoy Meg’s work, but it does piss me off when people all jump on one person, nuff or not, and start with the ridicule and the “why are you still here then” etc. A group against one person is never fair is it?
“I’m offended on my own behalf. This is an abomination.” Thanks, Paul, for giving everyone a reason to stop criticizing Pauline for what SHE said. I do hope you were saying that “tongue in cheek”.
Kimski (and a few others), I thank you & will take your defense to heart as I withdraw from this ridiculous fray. I think Yak’s post took the cake. Imagine comparing a marriage proposal to pugs at porn! Such twisted thinking would preclude the posting of ANYTHING pleasurable. Please, no more pics of cute puppies, because I used to have one & miss him dearly. Sheesh. Next time you want to give us a lecture on logic, Yak, don’t forget your clown nose & seltzer bottle.
“Such twisted thinking would preclude the posting of ANYTHING pleasurable.”
That was my point exactly. There isn’t anything on this site that couldn’t upset someone somewhere. That’s not a reason to refrain from posting things.
Really, Yak? So a pic, say, of kittens nestled blissfully in the bosom of their catmother will “upset someone somewhere”? If that’s true, then yeah, let the atrocity photos start coming, because it’s all the same. How about a little common sense? On the other hand, I think you’re just messing around. Have your fun.
Pauline… you *do* know about the Cats ‘n’ Racks(TM) category, right?
Pauline, as this whole silly commentroversy amply illustrations…common sense isn’t common.
Yes, Theo, I recently checked out the cats/racks thing, and I must say I was shocked, shocked to see such a corruption of kitteh morals.
Whew, OK, now I *know* you’re joking… glad to see it.
Yeah, I guess for the most part I am joking. But I do have a real desire to see the site be lilly-pure, disneyfied, whatever you wanna call it. That’s just me.
Sorry if I sometimes lapse into name-calling & sarcasm. I am eminently ignorable–just look the other way. (Of course some people can’t, and that’s when the fur flies.)
Your site provides an infusion of sweetness & light into this often dreary world. Rutting dogs & soaked rabbits nothwithstanding, I salute you.
Given that I have commented several times in different threads about how I don’t like how “nuffers” are often ridiculed, I would like to point out that my reaction to your comment had nothing to do with the fact that you were offering a critique. I merely think that to suggest that elderly people who are no longer having sex would get wistful over dogs humping is ridiculous. I just can’t imagine a human being looking at dogs humping and genuinely equating it with their own sex life–or lack thereof. Personally, I’ve never found the sight of dogs humping to be… uh… stirring. But maybe I’m just naive.
MMc, stay naive. And step AWAY from the Google. Right now.
I recall being at the Washington Park Zoo in Portland and seeing two red Pandas getting mmm… amorous… in front of a class of young children, who were asking their teacher what the little red pandas were doing…
“I think they’re talking about family matters,” the teacher said.
Theo, LMAO, yes don’t google bestiality, you’ll regret it.
OK, I had to do it.
Gives a new meaning to cute OVERLOAD, wakka wa wa…..
Okay, the cat with cleavage was bad enough, but this is uncalled-for! My kid sometimes looks at this site!
Well, as someone who was once a child and saw much more “graphic” stuff than this on PBS and outside in the neighbor’s yard, I would say this is TEWTALLY HI-LARIOUS!(And if I couldn’t channel my inner immature fourteen-year-old, my life would be a lot less amusing)
Just because baby cannot have steak, must we all eat mush?
only in America….
really, in europe it won’t occur to people that a (tiny) picture of shagging dogs could be regarded as inappropriate for kids.
People are raising their children to be totally ignorant imbeciles now a days if they are worried about seeing a picture of dogs humping. My dogs humped each other pretty much 24 hours a day when I was a kid (and they were neutered) and yet I was none the worse for wear because of it.
Now I understand why the US has the largest pornography industry in the world. If a bunch of complaining prudes can get flustered about something as cute and hilarious as this it’s little wonder that your average puritanical American can see almost anything as dirty or pornographic (and hence someone can sell it back to these sexually ignorant dolts for a profit as something “forbidden”). What a bunch of sexual freaks! And you wonder why the rest of the world finds this type of complaining disgusting, hostile and sexually immature.
Meg’s got a FANTASTIC sense of humor period! And you other prudes get the pornographic criminals you deserve- and probably purvey!
Good luck to ya! Doggie luv can be funny- this dog thinks it’s interesting anyway! :p
Thanks for the giggle Meg.
PS: If your kids can’t handle images of animals doing what they do then it’s simply the fault of an intellectually neglectful parent. Get off your butt and teach your kids to comprehend life on planet Earth! Or for the sake of the rest of us who enjoy cute overload as is- just get off the internet as a whole. You’re obviously too immature to handle life in public! *rollin’ eyes* Sheesh!
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 13,352 other followers