Comments on: A Kinder, Gentler muzzle http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/ Cute Overload :D Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:33:39 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Yuki http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300573 Yuki Sun, 23 Jul 2006 02:06:24 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300573 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Hi all~ its a HE by the way. He is a Japanese Spitz. ^.^</p> </div>

Hi all~ its a HE by the way. He is a Japanese Spitz. ^.^

]]> By: Muggs http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300579 Muggs Wed, 10 May 2006 10:35:28 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300579 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>She's an American Eskimo, without a doubt!</p> </div>

She’s an American Eskimo, without a doubt!

]]> By: FzerozeroT http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300585 FzerozeroT Tue, 09 May 2006 21:25:17 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300585 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>hi, she's a miniature pom isn't she, could you e-mail me some more photos coz she looks just like ours (but cleaner)</p> </div>

hi, she’s a miniature pom isn’t she, could you e-mail me some more photos coz she looks just like ours (but cleaner)

]]> By: E. Collison http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300589 E. Collison Tue, 09 May 2006 11:28:39 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300589 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Theo, yes, though in this case, I'm not talking about screen-res.</p> <p>Could also be ISP-related, I'm thinking.</p></div>

Theo, yes, though in this case, I’m not talking about screen-res.

Could also be ISP-related, I’m thinking.

]]> By: Theo http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300594 Theo Tue, 09 May 2006 11:08:26 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300594 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>E.C. -- sounds good, but screen *resolution* isn't about inches, it's about how many pixels your OS is displaying. If you're on a newish widescreen laptop running Windows XP, you should probably have your screen-res set to 1280x768.<br /> (Windows Control Panel --> Display --> Settings tab --> Screen Resolution slider)</p> <p>If that doesn't help, then I'm tapped...</p></div>

E.C. — sounds good, but screen *resolution* isn’t about inches, it’s about how many pixels your OS is displaying. If you’re on a newish widescreen laptop running Windows XP, you should probably have your screen-res set to 1280×768.
(Windows Control Panel –> Display –> Settings tab –> Screen Resolution slider)

If that doesn’t help, then I’m tapped…

]]> By: E. Collison http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300598 E. Collison Tue, 09 May 2006 10:32:45 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300598 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>Well, I've got a relatively new "widescreen" laptop (I'd have to measure the screen to be providing correct info. here), and the strips will not show up unless I go to full screen. This is true in the latest build of Firefox, though I haven't tried Opera yet, and don't use IE.</p> </div>

Well, I’ve got a relatively new “widescreen” laptop (I’d have to measure the screen to be providing correct info. here), and the strips will not show up unless I go to full screen. This is true in the latest build of Firefox, though I haven’t tried Opera yet, and don’t use IE.

]]> By: Zelda http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300606 Zelda Tue, 09 May 2006 08:08:06 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300606 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>It's a snufflelupagus! He dyed his snout pink - tres chic!</p> </div>

It’s a snufflelupagus! He dyed his snout pink – tres chic!

]]> By: Theo http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300613 Theo Tue, 09 May 2006 07:07:41 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300613 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Katey and E.C --</p> <p>The only weirdness I see with this new layout (which I have zero control over, btw) is that the columns cover some of the *background* image. That is, the stripey wallpaper gets cut off a little, but never the actual post images or comments. It looks the same using FireFox and Internet Explorer, at screen resolutions down to 1024x768 (though my usual res is 1280x1024).</p> <p>If it's not working for you, you're some of the few exceptions, and Meg would need to know more detail about what you're using to be able to test properly. Some folks have mentioned Apple's "Safari" browser for example, or you might be using Opera, or your screen resolution might be set really low (like 800x600), etc...</p></div>

Katey and E.C –

The only weirdness I see with this new layout (which I have zero control over, btw) is that the columns cover some of the *background* image. That is, the stripey wallpaper gets cut off a little, but never the actual post images or comments. It looks the same using FireFox and Internet Explorer, at screen resolutions down to 1024×768 (though my usual res is 1280×1024).

If it’s not working for you, you’re some of the few exceptions, and Meg would need to know more detail about what you’re using to be able to test properly. Some folks have mentioned Apple’s “Safari” browser for example, or you might be using Opera, or your screen resolution might be set really low (like 800×600), etc…

]]> By: Alex http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300618 Alex Tue, 09 May 2006 06:56:44 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300618 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Haha : )</p> <p>He could still get in trouble with that thing on, I know how those little guys operate.</p> <p><a href="http://r2000.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://r2000.blogspot.com</a></p></div>

Haha : )

He could still get in trouble with that thing on, I know how those little guys operate.

http://r2000.blogspot.com

]]> By: ebee http://cuteoverload.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle/#comment-300620 ebee Tue, 09 May 2006 05:36:13 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/05/08/a_kinder_gentle#comment-300620 <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <p>I think the little puppy looks a bit humiliated..."how COULD you do this to me??" Maybe this qualifies for Cute but Sad?</p> </div>

I think the little puppy looks a bit humiliated…”how COULD you do this to me??” Maybe this qualifies for Cute but Sad?

]]>