Comments on: Holy crapulence! Sweet! http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/ Cute Overload :D Wed, 23 May 2012 07:51:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: stacy http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305472 Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:29:57 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305472

I would love to vote if the webby site wasn’t designed by some idiot who’d never seen a computer before… I’ve entered their “verification” text too many effing times to count and every time it comes back saying I entered it wrong… *gnashes teeth*

]]> By: Meredith http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305477 Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:14:25 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305477

You are kicking the competition’s ass!
Rocketboom: 5%
we make money not art: 5%
TreeHugger: 15%
BoingBoing: 15%
CuteOverload: 57%!!!

]]> By: Becci http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305483 Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:19:34 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305483

AuntieMame–glad you didn’t find my comment offensive. I was a little worried it might come off that way when I really just wanted to make a polite point. I like arbed’s suggestion of “make like cuteologists” since that includes every devoted follower of the Cute!

Oh, and regarding Meg’s comments–I like them most of the time, and when I don’t, big deal. Not that this was up for debate in any significant way, but, uh, Meg? Keep it up!

]]> By: Theo http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305489 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:27:05 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305489

If anyone actually does that, I hope they use your vote for you, too.

]]> By: Mandelbaum http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305499 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 20:44:31 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305499

Too much work to register. Someone register for me, and then post the login info for me to use so I can vote.

]]> By: arbed http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305507 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 17:39:13 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305507

I didn’t find Rachelle’s comment offensive in the least. Perhaps Melike didn’t realize that Rachelle was in fact pointing out the exact point that Melike was making about political comments not belonging here (such as Daniel’s). Now Meg is a different story – her captions and comments are all only ever to enhance the pictures, and well, it’s her site! It’s all only ever about the cute, people. Now make like good little cuteologists and VOTE!!! Go Meg!

]]> By: AuntieMame http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305515 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:39:26 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305515

But if Meg can post only stuff that *everyone* finds funny, she might as well close up shop and go home. There is always going to be someone who doesn’t find a particular caption funny. Just as there is always someone who doesn’t find a particular photo cute.

IMO, it’s the captions that make the photos and I would enjoy CO a whole lot less if it was nothing but animal pictures.

And I can’t speak for Rachelle, but what I found offensive about Daniel’s post was not his views on voting but his ugly namecalling. If he has a problem with something, he can say so politely. As Becci did. Or as you did, Melike.

The “ignorant ass” dig was completely uncalled for.

]]> By: A thinker http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305521 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:35:00 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305521

No, no! Meg’s comments are brilliant and funny. Otherwise, would just be flat pictures of cute animals.

Meg Interprets The Cute for us. Keep it up, Meg!

]]> By: Theo http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305527 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:22:07 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305527

Hi Meg. Keep doing what you’re doing, the way you’re doing it. Whee!

]]> By: Melike http://cuteoverload.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence/#comment-305531 Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:10:31 +0000 http://cuteoverload.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/holy_crapulence#comment-305531

Rachelle: political comments and/or any other topics irrelevant to cute baby animals is also inappropriate for a site as internationally renowned as cuteoverload. while I love the site, I feel like some of Meg’s commentary detracts from the cuteness of the animals. I have always been a fan of pictures speaking for themselves, not needing any additional captions, made up stories, jokes, etc. in an effort to make it funnier or cuter. while cute overload is flourishing, perhaps this subjective (read: not very funny to everyone) humor should be kept solely in the comments section.

Just some constructive criticism, Meg. I do love the site and visit it every day. and congratulations.

]]>